The Biblical Basis for a Modern 
    Prophet   
By Frank B. Holbrook
Biblical Research Institute
  April 1982 
[Return to the Homepage]
[Return to the Issues 
  and Answers page]
      The prophetic gift rests upon the 
  fundamental need for communication to take place between the Deity and the fallen 
  family of humankind. The occult and the category of false prophets are two systems 
  which have functioned throughout human history to deceive and to mislead the 
  ignorant and the unwary away from genuine communications from God. On the other 
  hand, God's communications systems—basically the 
  prophetic gift—is delineated clearly in the Scriptures 
  (Num 12:6; Amos 3:7; Luke 1:70).
      Four words (three Hebrew, one Greek) are used in the Scriptures 
  to refer to the human instrument in this form of communication. Ro'eh 
  (1 Sam 9:9; Isa 30:10) and the more common chozeh (2 Sam 
  24:11; Amos 7:12; 2 Kgs 17:13, et cetera) both relate to the concept of 
  "sight" and are commonly translated "seer." The idea seems to be that God opens 
  to the "eyes"—that is, to the understanding of 
  the prophet—whatever information or messages He 
  may wish to have transmitted to His people. The terms therefore emphasize the 
  reception of a divine message by the prophet.
      The meaning of the later and more commonly used word, nвbi' 
  (1 Sam 9:9) and its Greek equivalent, prophetes, is best seen 
  in the following usage:
    And the 
    Lord said unto Moses, See, I have made thee a god to Pharaoh: and 
    Aaron thy brother shall be thy prophet [nвbi']. Thou shalt 
    speak all that I command thee: and Aaron thy brother shall speak unto Pharaoh. 
    (Exod 7:1, 2)
    And thou 
    shalt speak unto him [Aaron], and put words in his mouth: and I will be with 
    thy mouth, and with his mouth, and will teach you what ye shall do. And he 
    shall be thy spokesman unto the people: and he shall be, even he 
    shall be to thee instead of a mouth, and thou shalt be to him instead 
    of God. (Exod 4:15, 16)
    It is evident 
  from these statements in which Moses and Aaron were to role-play as God and 
  prophet respectively that the prophet (nвbi') was viewed as a divinely 
  appointed spokesman for God. The LXX (Septuagint) term for nвbi' in 
  this instance is prophetes, the term which appears in the NT and from 
  which our English word prophet is derived.
      Prophetes is a compound word composed of the 
  preposition pro which carries the nuance of "before"—or 
  "for" in this instance—and the verb phemi, 
  "to speak." Thus, in a general sense, the "prophet" is a spokesman for another. 
  But in the biblical setting, a true prophet is a spokesman or interpreter of 
  God, that is, he is a divinely inspired revealer, interpreter, or spokesman 
  for the Deity. So the terms nвbi'/ prophetes emphasize 
  the transmission aspect of the prophet's role. The four words together depict 
  a unique office or function: A prophet is one who receives communications from 
  God and transmits their intent to His people.
      As may be expected, speaking for God can shade off 
  into preaching for God. Consequently, there are those who hold that 
  in the NT the gift relates at times simply to expository preaching (Lenski, 
  p. 760, on Rom 12:6). Some see it as a "gift of inspired preaching" (International 
  Critical Commentary [ICC] on 1 Cor 13:2, p. 287), or "preaching the 
  word with power" (ICC on 1 Cor 12:10, p. 266). However, from the context 
  of 1 Corinthians 12—14 it is evident that 
  although active "prophesying" may at times take the form of effective 
  preaching (1 Cor 14:3), it was preaching based on divine revelation (1 Cor 
  14:30) and not upon the simple illumination of the Scriptures by the Spirit 
  which may occur to any minister who speaks for God.
      The NT maintains a difference between the simple ministry 
  of the Word and the prophetic ministry, between the "teacher" and the "prophet" 
  (Eph 4:11; 1 Cor 12:28). The preaching of Barnabas and Paul on the themes 
  of salvation doubtless sounded much alike. But whereas one spoke by the authority 
  of the written Word, the other spoke with the added authority of divine revelation 
  (Gal 1:11, 12).
      While some authorities hold that "prophesying" (propheteuo) 
  in the NT refers at times to preaching, it is conceded that a category of persons 
  who received and communicated direct and special revelations from God did function 
  in the New Testament as prophets (Luke 1:25-38; Acts 11:27, 28; 13:1; 15:32; 
  21:9). What was their function?
The Role of the Prophetic 
    Gift in the NT 
    In the basic New 
  Testament lists of spiritual gifts the "prophetic gift" is listed as second—between 
  that of apostles (first) and that of teachers (third). See 
  1 Corinthians 12:28-30; Ephesians 4:11. The gift did not usurp the role 
  of the apostles, but its function affected the apostles at times as well as 
  the church membership in general. Some of the apostles were themselves endowed 
  with this gift. The activities of persons so endowed in NT times may be summarized 
  as follows:
      1. They were commissioned at times to forewarn of coming 
  difficulties (Acts 11:27-30; 20:23; 21:10-14). In the first instance (Acts 
  11) the warning of coming famine resulted in a brotherly bonding of the Gentile 
  Christians in Antioch with the Jewish Christians in Judea. The former, contrary 
  to ethnic customs, willingly sent relief to their Jewish brothers in Christ.
      2. Through the gift the foreign mission outreach of the 
  church was initiated (Acts 13:1, 2). It also had a part in directing where 
  the early missionaries were to labor (Acts 16:6-10). In Paul's second missionary 
  tour it is noted that he was accompanied by Silas, a prophet (Acts 16:40).
      3. In a doctrinal crisis the gift functioned to encourage 
  and to confirm the membership in the true doctrine. The crisis pertained 
  to the relationship of the Jewish ritual to the salvation of Gentile Christians. 
  A large church council made a decision in harmony with the Spirit's directive 
  (Acts 15), although the decision was not inwardly accepted by all. The controversy 
  had broken out in Antioch to which church the decision of the council was related 
  by letter. Judas and Silas ministered for a time to this group: "And Judas and 
  Silas, who were themselves prophets, exhorted [parakaleo, 
  appeal to, urge, exhort, encourage] the brethren with many words and strengthened 
  [confirmed, KJV; episterizo, strengthen] them" (Acts 15:32, 
  RSV).
      4. The prophets built up, encouraged, and consoled the 
  church. "He who prophesies speaks to men for their upbuilding, 
  (oikodome, metaphorically, `building up the spiritual life') and encouragement 
  [paraklesis, encouragement, exhortation] and consolation [paramuthia, 
  encouragement, comfort, consolation]" (1 Cor 14:3, RSV).
      5. The prophets tended (along with the other gifts) to 
  unify the church in the true faith and to protect it from false doctrines. 
  "And his gifts were . . . until we all attain to the unity of the faith . . 
  . so that we may no longer be children, tossed to and fro and carried about 
  with every wind of doctrine, by the cunning of men, by their craftiness in deceitful 
  wiles" (Eph 4:11-15, RSV).
      6. The prophets along with the apostles assisted in founding 
  the church. "You are . . . built upon the foundation of the apostles 
  and prophets, Christ Jesus himself being the cornerstone" (Eph 2:20, RSV; 
  cf. 3:5; 4:11).
      "The couplet `apostles and prophets' may bring together the 
  Old Testament (prophets) and New Testament (apostles) as the basis of the Church's 
  teaching. But the inverted order of the words (not `prophets and apostles' but 
  `apostles and prophets') suggests that probably New Testament prophets are meant. 
  If so, their bracketing with the apostles as the Church's foundation is significant. 
  The reference must again be to a small group of inspired teachers, associated 
  with the apostles, who together bore witness to Christ and whose teaching was 
  derived from revelation (Eph 3:5) and was foundational" (John R. W. Stott, 
  God's New Society [Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1979], 107. 
  For a similar viewpoint, see The Expositor's Greek Testament, W. R. 
  Nicoll, ed. [Grand Rapids, MI: Wm B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, reprint 
  1961], 3:299, 300).
The Continuance of the Prophetic 
    Gift 
    As we have already 
  noted, the NT does set forth a doctrine of "spiritual gifts," or charismata, 
  "gifts of grace" (1 Cor 12; Eph 4). These endowments by the Holy Spirit 
  upon individual members of the church are to "equip the saints for the work 
  of ministry, for building up the body of Christ" (Eph 4:12, RSV). "As each has 
  received a gift," he is to employ it in the service of the church and thus assist 
  in forwarding its work in the earth (1 Pet 4:10, 11, RSV; cf. Rom 12:6, 7).
      Since the gifts are to be continuously bestowed as the Spirit 
  sees fit "until we all attain to the unity of the faith and of the knowledge 
  of the Son of God, to mature manhood, to the measure of the stature of the fullness 
  of Christ . . ." (Eph 4:13, RSV), it is obvious that the gifts are 
  intended to function until the church has completed its ministry and human probation 
  has closed.
      There is no evidence in Scripture that God ever intends to 
  withdraw the prophetic gift or any of the other gifts this side of the Second 
  Coming (cf. 1 Cor 13:8-12). There is, instead, the OT prophecy of Joel 
  2:28-32 which is repeated by Peter (Acts 2:16-21) foretelling an end-time outpouring 
  of the Holy Spirit and a resultant activity of spiritual gifts. In that connection 
  it is appropriate to note that false prophets will be active in the end-time 
  as well (Mat 24:24).
The Bible Canon and Spiritual 
    Gifts 
    The Holy Scriptures, 
  composed of the Old and New Testaments, are themselves the product of the operation 
  of the prophetic gift. Indirectly the Scriptures themselves indicate a closed 
  canon of sacred writings. The limits and sections of the OT were already known 
  and understood in Jesus' time. In Matthew 23:35, Jesus indirectly indicates 
  its outer limits: Genesis to 2 Chronicles (the last book in the Hebrew 
  Bible), and its three-part division in Luke 24:27, 44—the 
  Law of Moses, the prophets, and the writings, the first of which was the Psalms.
      Hebrews describes the unfolding revelation thus: "In many 
  and various ways [literally, `In many portions and in many ways'] God spoke 
  of old to our fathers by the prophets; but in these last days he 
  has spoken to us by a Son" (Heb 1:1, 2, RSV). Starting with Moses (fifteenth 
  century B.C.) the revelations from God begin to be recorded; over the centuries 
  other prophets record the messages entrusted to them as God saw fit to further 
  the understanding of His people. Finally, God chose to make His ultimate revelation 
  through His Son. Jesus Christ has given the human family the greatest revelation 
  of God possible for man to receive (John 1:18). The New Testament is 
  the inspired apostolic witness and interpretation of Jesus Christ and 
  His teaching. His is an unrepeatable life and disclosure; theirs is an unrepeatable 
  attestation to Him. See sketch:

    Since Christ's 
  life on earth and the apostolic interpretation of it provide the ultimate revelation 
  of God, no function of the prophetic gift (as one of the spiritual gifts) subsequent 
  to the NT can equal, supersede, or be an addition to its unique witness. But 
  rather, all claims to the prophetic gift must be tested by the Scriptures (1 
  Thess 5:19-21; 1 John 4:1-3; Matt 7:15-20).
      The postcanonical function of the prophetic gift whenever 
  it shall appear will be similar to its function in the time of the apostles 
  and will carry with it the authority of the Spirit who speaks to the church 
  through it. The function may be summarized as follows:
      A postcanonical manifestation of the prophetic gift—
      1. Will point back to Holy Scripture as the basis of faith 
  and practice.
      2. Will illumine and clarify teachings already present in 
  Scripture.
      3. Will apply the principles of Scripture to the daily life.
      4. May be a catalyst to direct the church to carry out its 
  commission as charged in the Scriptures.
      5. May assist in establishing the church.
      6. May reprove, warn, instruct, encourage, build up, and 
  unify the church in the truths of Scripture.
      7. May function to protect the church from false doctrine 
  and to establish believers in the true.
End-Time Manifestation of 
    the Gift 
    Joel 2:28-32. 
  Living in the "last times" (from the OT perspective, 1 Pet 1:20; Heb 1:2) 
  the apostle Peter saw a fulfillment of Joel's prophecy in the Pentecostal outpouring 
  of the Spirit with the endowment of tongues (Acts 2). However, Pentecost seems 
  to have been only a partial fulfillment, for Jesus places the signs in the sun 
  and moon mentioned by Joel as coming after the Dark Ages of persecution and 
  nearer the advent of "the great and the terrible day of the Lord" (Joel 2:31). 
  Furthermore, Joel specifically refers to a manifestation of the gift of prophecy. 
  Thus a complete fulfillment of Joel's ancient prediction would require an end-time 
  manifestation of the prophetic gift.
      Matthew 7:15-20; 24:24. Inasmuch 
  as Jesus foretold the appearance of "false prophets" in the end-time, such a 
  prediction is presumptive evidence of a true manifestation of the gift.
      1 Corinthians 12; Ephesians 4; et cetera. 
  The New Testament doctrine of "spiritual gifts" (which includes the prophetic 
  gift) has never been rescinded. If the past may give any indication of the future, 
  we may note that the prophetic gift commonly functioned at periods of crisis 
  or significance: Noah before the Flood; the major and minor prophets cluster 
  around the critical periods of Israel's history when Assyria, Babylon, and Persia 
  threaten or affect Israel's existence; John the Baptist before Christ's advent, 
  et cetera. It would be reasonable to expect therefore, some kind of prophetic 
  manifestation prior to the close of human probation and the Second Advent, the 
  consummation of the Plan of Salvation.
      Revelation 12:17; 19:10. While 
  our pioneers emphasized the prediction of Joel 2 in defense of a legitimate 
  manifestation of the prophetic gift, they were not unmindful of the implications 
  of Revelation 12:17; 19:10. Writing in the Review and Herald of October 
  16, 1855, James White stated:
    But let 
    us look at Joel 2:32, and see where he locates the prophecy. "And it shall 
    come to pass, that whosoever shall call on the name of the Lord shall be delivered: 
    for in mount Zion and in Jerusalem shall be deliverance, as the Lord hath 
    said, and in the remnant whom the Lord shall call." It is the REMNANT that 
    is to witness these things. It is the remnant (or last portion of the church) 
    that keep the commandments of God and have the testimony of Jesus Christ (which 
    is the spirit of prophecy, Revelation 19:10) most certainly, that is to share 
    this deliverance. "Whosoever shall call on the name of the Lord" in the time 
    of trouble such as never was, will share that deliverance. "Shall not God 
    avenge his own elect, which cry day and night unto him . . . ?" 
    Luke xvii, 1-8. This calling on the name of the Lord is also symbolized by 
    the angel [Revelation 14:15] crying with a loud voice to Him that sat on the 
    cloud, "Thrust in thy sickle, and reap: for the time is come for thee to reap; 
    for the harvest of the earth is ripe."
    God has 
    ever manifested His power to His children according to their necessities and 
    their work. And can we for a moment suppose that God's people will pass through 
    the perils of the last days, and face the time of trouble such as never was, 
    and He not manifest Himself to them through those gifts which He Himself has 
    set in the Church? Nay, verily. God has by the prophet Joel promised to do 
    great things for the REMNANT `before the great and the dreadful day of the 
    Lord come.
    1. The book of 
  Revelation depicts two women: a pure woman clothed in light (Rev 12), and a 
  fallen woman, designated "Babylon the great" (Rev 17). In a sense, both women 
  symbolize the same entity: Christianity. Both have descendants (12:17; 17:5). 
  Revelation 12 appears to be sketching the loyal followers of God and the course 
  of their history; Revelation 17 symbolizes the development and course of Christian 
  apostasy.
      The pure woman hiding in the wilderness to escape persecution 
  both by the dragon (12:17), and by the fallen woman (17:6), in essence, represents 
  multiple loyal groups. These groups (while not necessarily doctrinally pure 
  in every respect: compare the symbolized history of the church, Rev 2:3), maintained 
  faith in God and loyalty to the Scriptures during the period of the Dark Ages. 
  How then is the "remnant of her seed" ("the rest of her offspring," RSV) to 
  be identified: Is it to be understood as an end-time remainder of Christianity 
  in general? Or, is it to be delimited to a specific group of Christians?
      2. The book of Revelation appears to describe the truehearted 
  followers of God in the end-time under two different classifications: (a) "the 
  remnant of her seed which keep the commandments of God" (12:17), and (b) "my 
  [God's] people" who are in Babylon (18:4). This would imply—in a technical sense—that the group designated in Revelation 12 as "the 
  remnant" do not constitute all genuine Christians in general, but is being delimited 
  here to a specific group by certain characterizations: they keep the commandments 
  of God and have the testimony of Jesus.
      Furthermore, it is reasonable to assume that the remnant 
  or last phase of God's people spoken of in Revelation 12:17 will also preach 
  God's last message. That last message is described in Revelation 14:9-12 as 
  the "third angel." It is a specific message with definite points and involves 
  the contents of the first two angels as well (see Rev 14:6-14). If those who 
  compose the "remnant" of Revelation 12 are the propounders of the message of 
  the third angel (Rev 14), then they would of necessity have to be a specific 
  group of Christians, distinguished by the characteristics of that special message. 
  Historically, Seventh-day Adventists have believed they were fulfilling the 
  role of the third angel; hence, we have naturally seen our movement as also 
  symbolized in 12:17.
      3. "The testimony of Jesus" (12:17). The question here is 
  whether this phrase denotes an end-time manifestation of the prophetic gift 
  in the group delimited as "the remnant of her seed."
      The expression "testimony of Jesus" occurs six times in the 
  book of Revelation (1:2, 9; 12:17; 19:10; 20:4). The first problem which relates 
  to the expression concerns translation. Two translations are grammatically possible:
      a. The testimony (witness) about/concerning 
  Jesus (objective genitive) = what Christians witness about Jesus; "who bear 
  testimony to Jesus" (RSV).
      b. The testimony (witness) from/by Jesus 
  (subjective genitive) = messages from Jesus to the church.
      The evidence from the use of this expression in the book 
  of Revelation suggests that it should be understood as a subjective genitive 
  (a testimony from or by Jesus), and that this testimony is given through prophetic 
  revelation. A few exhibits:
      a. Revelation 1:1, 2. "The 
  Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew unto 
  his servants . . . and he sent and signified it by his angel 
  unto his servant John: who bare record of the word of God, and of the testimony 
  of Jesus Christ, and of all things that he saw."
      In this context it is evident that "the Revelation of Jesus" 
  designates a revelation from or by Jesus to John. John then 
  bears record of this testimony/witness from Jesus. Both genitive expressions 
  make the best sense in context as subjective genitives and agree with Christ's 
  closing words in the book: "He which testifieth [witnesses] these things 
  saith, Surely I come quickly" (Rev 22:20).
    Commenting on the same phrase in Revelation 19:10, James Moffat 
writes.
    The testimony 
    of Jesus is practically equivalent to Jesus testifying (xxii, 20). It is the 
    self-revelation of Jesus (according to i, l, due ultimately to God) which 
    moves the Christian prophets. He forms at once the impulse and subject of 
    their utterances. (The Expositor's Greek Testament, W. Robertson 
    Nicoll, ed. [Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1961 reprint], 
    5:465)
    b. A comparison 
  of Revelation 19:10 and 22:9 links the testimony from Jesus with the prophetic 
  function:
19:10—"You must 
    not do that! I am a fellow servant with you" (RSV) and
22:9—"You must 
    not do that! I am a fellow servant with you" (RSV) and
19:10—"your brethren who hold the testimony of Jesus" 
    (RSV)
22:9—"your brethren the prophets . . ." 
    (RSV)
    c. Revelation 
  19:10 defines the testimony from Jesus as "the spirit of prophecy." 
  "For the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy."
      Although James Moffat regards the sentence as a gloss, he 
  analyzes its meaning from the implications of a subjective genitive.
    "For 
    the testimony or witness of (i.e., borne by) Jesus is (i.e., constitutes) 
    the spirit of prophecy." This . . . specifically defines the brethren 
    who hold the testimony of Jesus as possessors of prophetic inspiration. (Ibid.)
    4. The phrase 
  "spirit of prophecy" may be understood in either of two senses:
      a. It can refer to the Holy Spirit who indites or 
  conveys the prophetic revelation. "Holy men of God spake as they were moved 
  by the Holy Ghost" (2 Pet 1:21). Such expressions as the "Spirit of grace," 
  the "Spirit of truth," et cetera, designate the Spirit who conveys grace or 
  who conveys truth. So the testimony from Jesus may be equated or linked with 
  the Spirit's function to inspire the prophet with a revelation from God (cf. 
  1:10). Such a revelation is, in effect, a testimony or witness from Jesus. This 
  interpretation of the phrase is in keeping with 1 Peter 1:11 which notes that 
  the OT prophets were inspired by "the Spirit of Christ" and thus bore a testimony 
  from Him.
      b. The phrase, "spirit of prophecy," may also be understood 
  as the genius or distinctive essence of prophecy. Jesus bearing 
  witness is the very genius or soul of prophecy. James White phrased it this 
  way: "The spirit, soul, and substance of prophecy, is the testimony of Jesus 
  Christ. Or, the voice of the prophets relative to the plan and work of human 
  redemption, is the voice of the Redeemer" (Life Sketches [1880 ed.], 
  335-36, cited in SDA Encyclopedia, art., "Spirit of Prophecy").
      5. In either case, the passage of 12:17 stresses that the 
  remnant have (are having, present participle of echo) the 
  prophetic testimony from Jesus. It is a possession which the remnant 
  is described as having or holding onto as the dragon makes his final offensive 
  against God's end-time people. (See Arndt and Gingrich, A Greek-English 
  Lexicon on the use of marturia [witness/testimony in Revelation].)
      6. If the "testimony of Jesus" is indeed the witness of Jesus 
  to His church through the prophetic channel, then the question is whether the 
  characterization of 12:17 is stressing the remnant's possession of the Holy 
  Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments or the possession of a postcanonical 
  manifestation of spiritual gifts in the form of the prophetic gift. The former 
  assertion seems too obvious a point for the prophetic writer to underscore; 
  but a manifestation of the prophetic gift in an end-time setting would be significant.
      This prophecy regarding the remnant's possession of the prophetic 
  testimony from Jesus may be compared with the many references to the Messiah 
  in the Davidic Psalms. A reader in OT times would have related many—if not all—of the statements 
  in these psalms to David. Later—after Christ's life, atoning death, and resurrection—these 
  statements are seen to have a greater and more perfect application to the Messiah, 
  the Son of David. Just so, in the fulfillment of Revelation 12:17, together 
  with the development of the movement of the third angel, we may now see what 
  was not evident before that development: that the remnant's possession of the 
  "testimony of Jesus" involves the heartwarming truth that Christ has chosen 
  to speak once more through the prophetic gift to His people as they face the 
  myriad challenges of the end-time and the close of human probation.
[Return to the Homepage]
[Return to the Issues 
  and Answers page]